Behavior visibility
Analyze communication patterns, destinations, protocols, and changes from expected behavior.
Connect DNS, flow, protocol, destination, and asset context to expose command-and-control, lateral movement, suspicious egress, and policy violations.
Specific support depends on the deployment, licensed modules, connected systems, and validation scope. The architecture review makes those boundaries explicit.
Analyze communication patterns, destinations, protocols, and changes from expected behavior.
Link domain activity, resolved infrastructure, connection attempts, and affected assets.
Surface unusual east-west activity and relate it to identity and endpoint evidence.
Correlate periodicity, destination intelligence, protocol behavior, and local sightings.
Use business and exposure context to separate consequential activity from background noise.
Recommend scoped controls for firewall, DNS, endpoint, and identity systems.
The workflow keeps context and responsibility visible at every step.
Collect the network telemetry required for the protected segment and use case.
Build context around assets, peers, protocols, and expected communication.
Link anomalies to identity, endpoint, application, and threat intelligence evidence.
Propose bounded network or asset controls with approval and rollback.
Use representative data, named use cases, measurable acceptance criteria, and a documented deployment boundary.
Discuss a validation planNo. CERYNZA is positioned to consume and correlate supported network telemetry and coordinate with existing enforcement controls.
Sensor and collector placement should be designed around visibility zones, bandwidth, data residency, and administrative boundaries.
The platform relies on available metadata and approved inspection points. Decryption claims should only be made for deployment patterns that explicitly support it.
Walk through an evidence-driven investigation using your security architecture, telemetry sources, and response requirements.