Evidence graph
Connect every entity and observation behind an incident, with source-level traceability.
CERYNZA SOC
Investigate incidents with connected evidence—not another alert summary.
CERYNZA SOC links identities, assets, processes, network activity, application events, and historical alerts into one explainable investigation.
AI SOCBuilt around evidence, operator control, and verifiable outcomes.See the workflow
CORE CAPABILITIES
What the product is designed to do.
Specific support depends on the deployment, licensed modules, connected systems, and validation scope. The architecture review makes those boundaries explicit.
AI-assisted investigation
Summarize what happened, explain why it matters, and show the evidence behind each conclusion.
Confidence and explainability
Make scoring, uncertainty, corroborating signals, and contradictory evidence visible to the analyst.
Analyst-controlled response
Review scope, approvals, timeouts, rollback, and expected impact before execution.
Investigation workspace
Keep timeline, entities, notes, evidence, recommendations, and execution results in one case.
Complete audit evidence
Preserve who decided, what ran, where it ran, and whether the response succeeded.
OPERATING WORKFLOW
Move from signal to controlled action.
The workflow keeps context and responsibility visible at every step.
- 1
Correlate
Group related signals across identity, endpoint, network, cloud, and applications.
- 2
Investigate
Build a timeline, identify affected entities, and test competing explanations.
- 3
Decide
Present an evidence-backed verdict, confidence, and recommended response.
- 4
Respond
Execute only within the approvals and asset scope the organization permits.
TECHNICAL VALIDATION
Prove the fit before making the claim.
Use representative data, named use cases, measurable acceptance criteria, and a documented deployment boundary.
Discuss a validation planArchitecture and data-flow review
Telemetry source and connector inventory
Detection and investigation validation
Performance and resilience testing
Security, privacy, and governance review
Pilot acceptance criteria and evidence pack
FAQ
Questions technical buyers should ask.
Does the AI act without an analyst?
Autonomy is policy-controlled. Organizations can use assist-only, recommendation, approval-to-execute, or bounded automation by incident type, action, asset scope, and confidence threshold.
Can CERYNZA work with our current tools?
The platform is designed as an intelligence and response layer over existing telemetry and controls. Connector availability must be validated against the systems in your environment.
What evidence remains after an automated action?
The workflow retains the recommendation, approval, execution scope, result, errors, rollback state, and responsible identity for audit and review.
TECHNICAL VALIDATION
Validate AI SOC with your own security architecture.
Walk through an evidence-driven investigation using your security architecture, telemetry sources, and response requirements.